If you saw it in 19.0 post thins over in the 19.0 bugs thread and I'll get it.Originally Posted by Citadelvette
If you saw it in 19.0 post thins over in the 19.0 bugs thread and I'll get it.
Mike Dobbins
NWS Team
Naval Warfare Project
If you saw it in 19.0 post this over in the 19.0 bugs thread and I'll get it fixed.
Mike Dobbins
NWS Team
Naval Warfare Project
As this is a huge list I'm going to quote and reply as I go and I'm going to delete from the list units that are already in NWP, I'm not going to add etc.A-5 is in NWP as the RA-5, the A-5 was never used in anything but the recon role. deleted
AT-38B - this is a trainer version of the F-5. deleted
F/A-18F is a 2 seat version of the E with no difference in capabilities or loads. deleted
MH-90 was a one off test of the "no tail rotor" concept. deleted
KC-330 MRTT, there is no such thing. deleted
KC-767, see KC-330. deleted
Added to UK
These are trainers only. deleted.
Mike Dobbins
NWS Team
Naval Warfare Project
I don't have a generic business jet graphic I can use for these. Also most of these are just for VIP travel and of no functional military use. So probably not even if I got a graphic.
The HH-43 was used so little and was of insignificant in terms of capability and effect.
The HH-52 was used only by US based Coast Guard. So no on both.
This was one of the contenders for the Joint Common Sensor program that went 3x over budget and was canceled.
Need a graphic for these.
Already in the NWP in two loadouts.
The HC.1 was used by only one country, the UK, for 6 years and in small numbers, less then 15 or so were able to fly at any one time. So no.
Ditto for the Sycamore.
This is a seriously cool aircraft, but its so unique I need a specific graphic for it, which I don't have.
Do you mean the Westland Whirlwind? That first flew in 1938 and were produced in few numbers in WWII and tended to crash on take off?
Um, no.
This is a civilian turboprop airliner with no military users. No.
Both were strategically unimportant aircraft, so no.
Already in NWP.
Mike Dobbins
NWS Team
Naval Warfare Project
[QUOTE=Mike D;9851]Do you mean the Westland Whirlwind? That first flew in 1938 and were produced in few numbers in WWII and tended to crash on take off?
Um, no.[QUOTE]
I thought it was a lincesend built Sikorsky CH-19 and Wessex precursor.
[quote=Citadelvette;9856][quote=Mike D;9851]Do you mean the Westland Whirlwind? That first flew in 1938 and were produced in few numbers in WWII and tended to crash on take off?
Um, no.Is this what you were talking about?
I thought it was a lincesend built Sikorsky CH-19 and Wessex precursor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westland_Whirlwind_(fixed_wing)
Last edited by Mike D; 08-06-2008 at 08:34 PM.
Mike Dobbins
NWS Team
Naval Warfare Project
I forgot about that WWII fighter-bomber I meant this helicopter, darn names again. Anyway I don't think I would ask for the old WWII Whirlwind I would probably asked for something like a P-51 or F4U. I try to stick in the 1965-2015 era although a might fudge occasionaly (F2H Banshee w/ AIM-9s for HMCS Bonaventure!)
.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westlan...8helicopter%29
Last edited by Citadelvette; 08-06-2008 at 09:11 PM.
Could the 20mm tailguns be added to the early B-52s at least the B-52D?
If i remember correctly early B-52's didn't have 20mm only the H's had that all other had 4x .50 cal in the tail.
Mike Perry
"Theirs not to make reply, Theirs not to reason why, Theirs but to do and die"
-The Charge of Light Brigade, By Alfred Tennyson
"Artillery adds dignity, to what would otherwise be an ugly brawl"
- Frederick the Great, king of Prussia, 1740 to 1786
"An AIM-9 is like a Marine in a bar, he heads for the hottest thing in the area."
-old pop2000
you might be right, l'll check
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote